"Do you mean to say that people actually collect these?"
That
was a remark during a discussion on coil stamps and the numbers on
their back I participated in some weeks ago. Must have been a postal
historian! Yes, of course we collect them because they may yield
valuable information. And they can make the difference between ordinary
stamps and rare ones. Let me educate all you doubters.
First of all, what's the difference between these two stamps?
Exactly, one is a coil stamp, and the other is a sheet stamp, which only becomes clear when you look at the back.
Although
honesty compels me to admit that the stamp without a number on its back
may also be a coil stamp, because on these German coils, the number is
only placed on each fifth coil stamp.
The
French are more accommodating for they place a number on each and every
coil stamp. And they are even more accommodating by giving the coil
stamps imperforate sides.
Miles better than the British who don't do neither. (Oops, well I got that one wrong, didn't I?! See Ian's rectification in the Comments section below.)
The
Swiss used to have the number preceded by a letter. Of old letters A to
L were most often encountered, with 12 coils in a sheet, each column a
different letter. The later letters do exist but are extremely rare, and
though I've been looking for well over ten years now, I've never come
across one.
Coil
stamp numbers may also tell you when the coils were printed. Take a
look at the Dutch Beatrix definitives for example. They've been around
for a while, and during all those years, the printers Enschedé have
changed the format and lettertype a number of times, making it possible
to date the stamps. And from the number you may also derive how large
the coils they originated from are.
75ct: type 7 from coil of 10,000, printed in 1991-2. 1g: type 7c+A from coil of 1000, printed in 1998. |
Enschedé
also printed the Machin coil stamps of Hong Kong, but I'm not sure
whether they were printed for a period long enough to see any changes in
the number. Still a bit of research to do there, which might make a
nice project for the coming winter months.
Anyway, in less than five minutes I've managed to give you umpteen reasons why it does make
sense to look at coil stamp numbers and not just dismiss them as being
there for accounting purposes. Better get your stockbooks out and see
what hidden gems you have in there!
See yous later
Adrian
The Beatrix and Machins above - are those numbers the start of a coil?
ReplyDelete" Miles better than the British who don't do neither."
ReplyDeleteCome on Adrian, GB's self-adhesive coils have numbers every 10 -
http://norphil.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/2010-is-not-done-yet-1st-class-self.html
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EJIq2RjkxYk/T_IMmkbKJnI/AAAAAAAAD0U/-FrSmaEgeDk/s320/IMG_0005.JPG
@ Julia: well, near the start anyway. All coils I have seen so far count backwards so when the coil is nearly finished you end up with 0010 then 0005 and then that's it.
ReplyDelete@ Ian: thanks for rectifying that. I really didn't know!
We Machinites know that non-self-adhesive coils can be identified by the smooth edge of the perforations on the non-joined sides. This is apparently not the case for the German and Australian coils you show.
ReplyDelete--Larry
That's right! It would seem these are torn into strips rather than cut.
ReplyDelete