Would it be fair to say that the art of stamp engraving is
most obvious in portrait stamps? Not being an expert at all, it seems to me
that to portray a human being in engraved lines must be about the hardest thing
to do. Harder than engraving views or architecture or the like. Is it because
one has to breathe life into the subject? Is it why so many engravers
specialise in portraits, because it's the ultimate challenge?
Whatever it is, I personally rate recess portraiture the
best, and when countries issue definitive portrait series printed in intaglio,
they get top scores from me. Point in case: the United States of America. In
1980 they embarked on a long-running set called ‘Great Americans’. Unique
because it was really the first portrait definitive set which did not focus
largely on former presidents, but people from all walks of life.
Quite a large team of engravers was involved, and although
this meant different styles, the stamps do work together as a set. Actually, it’s
good to see how different engravers tackle the problem of engraving a face.
Some, like Kenneth Kipperman for example, use quite stark lines to portray
their man or woman. The 20c portraying the UN Secretariat member Ralph Bunche
is a good example of that.
It’s a hard, angular portrait, but Kipperman shows he can
also do a softer engraving. The portrait of scientist Rachel Carson is much
softer, even though you can still see the many hard lines.
Joseph Creamer Jr’s style is unusual, I think, in that he
gives his portraits a very sharply engraved outline. Note the strong hair lines
on the stamp of the politician Henry Clay.
Even more remarkable is the portrait of the physicist Robert
Millikan, which has a sharp line around his whole face. It seems rather odd at
first but when you concentrate on the face itself, as you are almost invited to
do because of the demarcation line, you see a beautiful, lifelike portrait.
Finally, Thomas Hipschen places some of his portraits against
a background. President Harry S. Truman is portrayed with a background at his
back only. To be honest, I’m not sure if I’m very fond of that. It looks like
the portrait is half cut out of a piece of paper.
I think I prefer his engraving of the author Pearl Buck, who
has a background around the whole of the portrait. What I also like better on
this stamp is that the background has soft, fading edges.
That is a beautiful engraving, I think, and actually one of
the highlights of the first set in this series.
See yous later
Adrian